By
Austin Coker
Reading time: 15 min
SEO is the compounding channel. Where Google PPC produces revenue the day you turn on the budget, SEO produces revenue that keeps coming without ongoing ad spend, for years. For agtech companies, SEO is how you build a moat that paid competitors cannot outspend. Whether the brand is launching a new category, defending market share against larger competitors, or building durable inbound pipeline, SEO is where the leverage lives.
But SEO done poorly is a slow, expensive way to lose 18 months. The brands compounding SEO ROI work with agencies that staff senior strategists, integrate SEO with Google PPC and GEO, and report against revenue instead of rankings.
SEO matters for agtech companies specifically because:
This guide is built for agtech companies in the $1M to $50M annual revenue range that want SEO running alongside Google PPC and GEO, with revenue accountability instead of vanity metrics.
We evaluated agencies against four criteria specific to agtech and agricultural technology.
The most common SEO agency failure mode is pod-based execution: a junior content writer + a generalist account manager + an offshore link builder, with senior leadership handling sales. The result is template-driven content that ranks for low-value queries. We weighted agencies that staff senior strategists per account with capped account loads.
SEO produces the best ROI when its insights flow between Google PPC and GEO programs. Agencies running SEO in a silo miss the compounding effect across channels. We favored agencies with integrated multi-channel methodologies over single-channel specialists.
Buyer intent, keyword psychology, and content patterns behave differently per vertical. Generalist SEO agencies bring transferable mechanics; vertical-specialist agencies bring category-specific intuition. We weighted agencies with documented client outcomes in agtech companies.
Most SEO reports lead with rankings, traffic, and impressions. None of those is revenue. We weighted agencies that report against attributable contribution to revenue, qualified pipeline, or LTV, even when attribution models are imperfect.
95 Projects is a search marketing agency built specifically for brands in the $1M to $50M revenue range that want SEO, Google PPC, and GEO running as one integrated practice instead of three siloed line items on a media plan. The agency is founder-led, staffs senior strategists with capped account loads (not pod-based execution), and reports against attributable revenue.
The pattern across these accounts is the same. Build SEO content clusters that earn rankings, then let Google PPC discover new converting queries and GEO turn the same content into AI citations. Three channels compounding together produce outlier results.
95 Projects runs SEO as the compounding engine at the center of a three-channel system designed to produce revenue over 6 to 18 months.
Phase 1: SEO foundation and topic-cluster architecture. Senior strategists audit the existing content footprint, surface category-defining queries that agtech companies buyers actually ask, and build topic-cluster architectures designed to compound rankings over 6 to 12 months. The first 60 days are heavily weighted toward content production and technical SEO fixes.
Phase 2: Google PPC as discovery channel. Once SEO content is shipping, Google Search and Google Shopping campaigns surface fast signal on what actually converts at the keyword and ad copy level. The keywords that convert through paid become high-priority SEO targets. Paid funds discovery; SEO compounds the wins.
Phase 3: GEO and AI citation flywheel. The SEO content earning rankings becomes the content earning citations in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini. The same article that ranks #3 on Google captures the AI-mediated buyers who never see a Google results page. GEO is where the compounding accelerates.
95 Projects runs all three channels under one team, with one senior strategist accountable to revenue across the full system. The agency takes on a small number of engagements per quarter to maintain senior involvement on every account.
First Page Sage is one of the most established B2B SaaS SEO agencies, built around long-form thought leadership and editorial-grade publishing. The agency runs premium content programs that earn citations and rankings simultaneously.
For B2B SaaS brands at $5M ARR and above with $20K+ per month budgets, First Page Sage is a strong fit. The AI search practice is newer but the underlying methodology suits GEO well.
Siege Media is a content-led SEO agency with a strong B2B SaaS portfolio. The team produces editorial content and infographic-style assets that earn rankings through link earning.
Siege added GEO services in 2025. For B2B SaaS brands that want content-heavy SEO with a GEO layer, Siege is a credible choice.
Directive’s Customer Generation methodology ties marketing spend directly to pipeline and revenue, with CFO-level reporting. The agency is best known for sophisticated B2B SaaS programs reporting against pipeline, not impressions.
Directive is among the strongest B2B SaaS SEO + paid partners at the upper end of the market. Engagement minimums of $30K+ per month and a focus on $20M+ ARR brands.
Skale is a SaaS-pure SEO agency built around three core deliverables: link building, content production, and technical SEO. The agency’s narrow vertical focus means deep familiarity with B2B SaaS buyer journeys.
Skale fits mid-market B2B SaaS brands wanting SEO at scale. The AI search and GEO offering is newer than the SEO core.
Foundation Marketing built its reputation on content distribution methodology and runs integrated SEO + paid + audience-building programs. The agency has been publicly investing in GEO since 2025.
For B2B SaaS brands at the mid-market level that want content-led growth with a developing GEO component, Foundation is a good fit.
Codeless is a content-only agency that specializes in technical and B2B SaaS content with a writer network deep enough to handle niche industries. The agency runs editorial calendars and produces long-form articles that consistently rank.
Codeless does not run paid or full GEO programs natively. For brands wanting a content partner alongside an in-house or agency-led SEO team, Codeless is a strong specialist.
Picking an SEO agency is harder than it looks because every agency reports impressive case studies on cherry-picked accounts. Four criteria separate the agencies that produce outlier results from the ones running template content.
Ask directly: who runs my account, what is their experience level, and how many other accounts do they manage? An account run by a senior strategist managing 4 to 6 accounts produces materially different results than one run by a content pod (junior writer + account manager + offshore link builder) under senior oversight. The agencies producing outlier results have senior account ownership.
The agencies running SEO in a silo miss the compounding effect of routing PPC-discovered converting keywords into SEO content, and turning that same content into GEO citations. Agencies that run all three channels under one team produce 10x+ the ROI of SEO-only engagements over 12 to 18 months.
Search queries used by agtech companies do not look like queries in other verticals. Producers ask for farm management shortlists, ROI methodologies, and integration matrices. The agency should be able to describe, in detail, the buyer intent patterns specific to agtech companies and the content types that earn rankings. A generalist agency will give you generic answers.
Ranking reports without conversion attribution are theater. Traffic growth without revenue attribution is vanity. Insist on agencies that will report against attributable contribution to revenue, qualified pipeline, or LTV. The numbers may be imperfect; perfect attribution does not exist. But imperfect revenue attribution beats perfectly tracked vanity metrics.
For most $1M to $50M agtech companies, hiring an agency is the right answer until you have $30M+ in revenue. Three reasons:
Above $30M in revenue, an in-house team paired with an agency in a consulting or audit role often outperforms pure agency engagements. By that point, the cost of senior in-house talent is justified by the volume of content production needed, and the agency role shifts from execution to strategy.
If your agtech company is doing between $1M and $50M in annual revenue, you want SEO integrated with Google PPC and GEO under one roof, and you want senior-level operators accountable to revenue, book a call with 95 Projects to talk through whether the three-channel approach fits your business.
SEO works best as the compounding center of a three-channel system. Here are the integrated services 95 Projects runs for agtech companies:
Have questions about working with us? Book a 30-minute strategy call to discuss your goals and see if we’re a good fit.
No-pressure conversation
Clear next steps (if we’re a fit)
Talk directly to an expert
Results depend on the niche, starting domain authority, and content footprint, but our SEO clients have produced 10x organic traffic lifts on optimized pages, 1,200%+ revenue increases over 12 months, and zero-to-#1 rankings for category-defining queries in 90 days. The integrated SEO + Google PPC + GEO model typically produces 10x+ blended ROI vs running channels in silos.
SEO takes longer than paid. Most accounts see first ranking movement in 60 to 90 days, meaningful traffic lifts in months 4 through 6, and material revenue impact in months 6 through 12. Established brands with strong existing content can move faster. The payoff is durable: SEO-earned rankings keep producing revenue for years with minimal ongoing spend.
Google PPC buys clicks. SEO and GEO earn them. PPC is fast and expensive per click. SEO is slow to build but produces traffic without ongoing ad spend. GEO is the newest layer, optimizing for citations and recommendations inside AI answer engines. The agencies producing outlier results use PPC for fast discovery and SEO + GEO as the compounding engines.
No. Any agency that guarantees keyword rankings does not understand how Google works. We guarantee the methodology, the content production rate, the technical SEO discipline, and consistent improvement against business KPIs over the course of an engagement.
It means every account is owned by a senior strategist (5+ years of SEO experience at the strategy level) with a capped portfolio of 4 to 6 accounts. We do not run pod-based execution where junior writers and account managers handle the day-to-day under senior supervision. The senior strategist owns the content roadmap, the technical SEO, and the revenue reporting.
Engagements typically run between $5,000 and $20,000 per month depending on the scope, channel mix, and content production volume. We work with agtech companies in the $1M to $50M annual revenue range and scope engagements to fit the size of the business.
